PDA

View Full Version : Some southern globulars from Texas



FaithJ
May 6th, 2012, 01:15 PM
The Texas Star Party's more southerly latitude at 30°N is 20° further south than my home latitude. Often I spend time looking at exotic objects or obscure galaxy groups as well as showpiece objects, too, with gigantic Dobsonians, but this year I also took the opportunity to observe those objects that don't rise above the horizon at home, or are on the horizon (in Corona Australis, Lupus, Norma and parts of Scorpius and Sagittarius) plus the ones that don't rise very high here (Hydra, northern Sagittarius, northern Scorpius).

Because I was using a fairly small scope, I stuck to globular clusters. Globulars are one of my favourite types of object to observe, as they are often quite bright and each one looks different from another. Some have bright dense cores or are totally resolved, while others amount to no more than a roundish smudge with uniform brightness. Some are very dense, while others are looser. And there are those that are in all stages of ‘in-between’.
These observations were made on the nights of 19/20 and 20/21 April. The seeing was poor to good while the transparency was pretty good (particularly after around 1 am). The naked eye limiting magnitude was 6.5 to 7.0. I used a (borrowed) 10 inch dob with the following eyepieces: 40mm TeleVue Plossl, 26mm Meade Plossl (came with the loaned scope), 12mm Type 4 TeleVue Nagler and 9mm Type 1 TeleVue Nagler (formerly of that parish, it was Jimi's and he sold it to me - great eyepiece!) giving magnifications of 31x, 48x, 104x and 139x respectively.


Corona Australis

NGC 6541 – This was almost in the trees. Very bright, quite small and round. At 139x it is lovely, with a compact centre and totally resolved outer halo. A foreground star touches the cluster’s eastern edge.


Hydra

NGC 4590 (=M68) – Large and bright at 48x. Round. At 139x it brightens a little towards the centre, which is not dense. Totally resolved.

NGC 5694– Extremely easy to find this is a moderately bright, tiny globular which lies on the northern end of a line of two stars. Star like but fuzzy at 48x. At 139x it is a not-quite-round glow with a slightly brighter middle. Dense, compact core. Unresolved.


Lupus

NGC 5824 – This is very small but extremely bright. It has a very bright, dense core – one of the densest I’d yet observed. Not resolved at 139x but there are hints of granularity with averted vision.

NGC 5927 – Bright, despite its low altitude. At 48x it is a round, fairly even glow that brightens a little towards the centre. At 139x it shows a slightly more irregular shape, with chains coming off from the centre. The centre is brighter than the outlying areas but is not compact or dense.

NGC 5986 – This is large and bright, even at low power, with a granular appearance. It is evenly bright across the face of the cluster and there is a foreground(?) star just touching the eastern side.
At 139x the cluster is fully resolved to the centre but there is also a background glow hinting at unresolved stars. The cluster is uniformly bright.


Norma

NGC 5946 – This is small and faint and quite hard to find, probably due mainly to its low altitude from my observing site. At 139x it appears as an unresolved but granular evenly bright glow. There is only very slight concentration towards the centre. There is a foreground star on the SW edge.


Ophiuchus

NGC 6287 – Obvious at low power, with a slightly irregular shape. Brightens slightly to the core. At 139x, the core is slightly brighter than the surrounding parts of the cluster but not dense. Also, at higher power, it looks rounder than it did at 48x. The cluster is partly resolved at higher power with stars dotted across its face.

NGC 6293 – At low power (48x) this is small, very bright and round with an obvious bright, dense core. Totally unresolved. At 139x, it is a nice object; the core is very bright and dense. The outer areas are resolved with averted vision.

NGC 6304 – A quite small but very bright and obvious cluster. It looks fairly evenly bright at 48x. 139x shows a slightly irregular shape with some brightening towards the core. Resolved with averted vision.

NGC 6316 – Small, bright and dense this is in a nice field. Round at low power (48x). At high power (139x) this is very nice indeed. It is round and bright, with a brighter dense core. Not resolved but the outer areas are granular with averted vision. A star is close in on the southern side.

NGC 6325 – Fairly big but with low surface brightness. At low power (48x) it is of even brightness and unresolved. With my 9mm Nagler (139x) it looks brighter towards the centre but the core isn’t dense. Granular with averted vision.

NGC 6342 – Small (about half the size of 6356). Fairly faint, but obvious. It has a fuzzy outer area which brightens towards a compact core. It remains granular, even with averted vision.


Sagittarius

NGC 6522 – This forms a very nice pair with fellow globular NGC 6528, in the same field of view at 48x and located adjacent to Gamma Sgr. At 48x, they are both of similar brightness. However, 6822 does look slightly brighter at 130x. 6522 is triangular at 48x at low power. Brighter in the middle but core not dense.

NGC 6528 – Fainter than 6522 at 139x. Direct vision shows uniform brightness across the cluster but averted vision shows moderate brightening towards the core. Partly resolved with averted vision.

NGC 6558 – Easy to locate, between Gamma and Epsilon Sgr, and lies in a rich field. At 48x it is moderately bright and round. 139x shows a partly-resolved glow which appears granular across its face. The cluster brightens towards its centre but the core is not dense.

NGC 6624– A very bright and small globular which lies in a nice rich field. Two stars lie immediately to the east. At 139x, this shows a very bright compact core. With averted vision it is partly resolved, especially the outer areas. A nice object.

NGC 6723 – Very bright, despite its low altitude. At 48x and 139x, it appears uniformly bright with no brightening towards the core at all. At 139x, it appears more irregular, due mainly to a dark area cutting into its north west side. It also appears to have dark areas in the eastern side. Resolved, particularly with averted vision.


Scorpius

NGC 6139 – Obvious at 31x as a bright, circular object. Round, with a brighter core. 139x shows a round object with a bright, dense core. The outer edges are only partly resolved with averted vision.

NGC 6144 – Very close to Antares (and M4) this was easy to find, even at 139x. It is mostly resolved especially with averted vision. There is no concentration towards the core and the cluster appears evenly bright throughout. There is a star on the edge of the western side of the cluster.

NGC 6388 – Very bright and small. Very obvious and easy to see at 31x. At high power (139x) there is a dense bright core surrounded by a halo which looks significantly larger with averted vision. A faint star almost touches the northern side.

NGC 6441 – This is very bright, small and round with a faint star to the south-west. At 139x it is round and shows some brightening towards the centre. Unresolved but granular.

NGC 6453 – This is faint and lies on the NW border of M7. Visible at 31x as a brightening of the background sky. At 139x it is irregular and shows only slight brightening towards the core, which is not dense. Partly resolved with averted vision.

NGC 6496 – Much fainter than near neighbour NGC 6541 this is well defined, irregular, smudge against the sky at 48x. At 139x, it is uniformly bright, unresolved and slightly elongated east-west. There are four foreground stars superimposed on it.

And, of course, I looked at the great southern globular itself, NGC 5139, Omega Centauri. Through Jimi's 48" it knocks your socks off and blinds you for about 10 minutes - don't use your observing eye! A 48” telescope is total overkill for looking at such a bright object (we also looked at M42 earlier in the evening and NGC 5128 – Centaurus A), but I couldn't resist it. It was superb. :shocked:
In the far more modest 10" at 104x, it appears very rich but not concentrated in the middle. It is totally resolved and the curious 'footprint' feature is obvious on the western side. Fabulous.

I am one of those people who enjoys getting observing pins (keeps me doing structured stuff, rather than just flitting about the sky in my default 'butterfly mind' mode when I end up seeing not-a-lot!) and I now have enough globular cluster observations for the Astronomical League's Globular Cluster program pin (I am a Member-at-large) so I'll get these - and the others I've done over the years and send 'em in.

Marko
May 7th, 2012, 09:23 AM
Great collection of Globs. Leave it to spring/summer to bring those around. I very much have enjoy globular clusters all through my observing days.

I too tend to the lists and AL clubs to keep focused goals and learn more as I progress. What are you going to choose for the 'challenge objects' for the AL club? Perhaps a Pal? When I was doing the AL glob club just a year ago it was like a game in trying to judge the concentration class (a requirement of each observation). There are 12 classes but frankly it could easily be compressed to 6 and nobody would be the wiser, very difficult and subjective to grade them exactly without photographic plates and detailed measurements but it is 'a game' to see if you can get close.

The very low concentration class globulars that have the very even blankets resembling fine open clusters with mostly same mag stars are very unique. A favorite pair for contrast that I enjoy this season hold M53 just under a degree from Ngc5053 (interesting also in that the numbers both have a 53 too). Later in the the summer the close proximity of another low concentration object, Ngc288, being near Ngc253 is a nice close pair of very different objects.

Thanks for the great collection of globulars.
Marko

FaithJ
May 7th, 2012, 12:35 PM
I've already observed Pal 11 and Pal 4. Interestingly, NGC 5466 is also on the challenge list although I have no idea why, as it is hardly difficult to see. I'll probably use Pal 11, as that is one of my favourite observations (it was a fabulous night, that night, the skies were the clearest I'd ever seen them, following a thunderstorm, and in the early hours the naked eye limiting mag was the best I'd ever seen from here, down around 6.5 which is exceptional).

The concentration class is a bit of a challenge. It probably comes down to 'best guess' (at least that's what I've been doing!) using the photos provided in the AL guide, except for the really obvious ones such as NGC 104 and NGC 4372 which are at opposite ends of the globular concentration 'spectrum'.

Marko
May 7th, 2012, 05:43 PM
RE: NGC 104 and NGC 4372 which are at opposite ends of the globular concentration 'spectrum'

And also at opposite ends of the world ... ;-) It's been just over 2 years since my mega-observing-trip down there where I bagged these and as many other objects that I could find from a very dark site (Arkaroola Resort) in a nice 12" dob. Took with me a well prepared plan that took 2 months to organize. Glad I went to the effort as it was so very fun.

FaithJ
May 7th, 2012, 07:55 PM
I had a 'mega-observing-trip' to Australia in 1997, where I saw NGC 104 and other southern goodies. I am hoping to go south again next year, for another pure observing trip, if finances and other factors will allow. I've been south of the Equator four times in total although only one trip (the 1997 trip) was for observing.