Search:

Type: Posts; User: mkronber; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    4
    Views
    6,477

    Hi Jimi, thanks for letting us know about the...

    Hi Jimi,

    thanks for letting us know about the positive observation of this object; and congratulations also from my side for your first known visual sighting!

    I tried this one in March during...
  2. Replies
    28
    Views
    15,893

    I know some specialists that I'm sure have seen...

    I know some specialists that I'm sure have seen Aintno 52 already ... guess Uwe knows whom I'm talking about.

    I forgot to mention the SUPER - No. 1 before:
    MCG 1-1-1 (aka UGC 12589) !...
  3. Replies
    28
    Views
    15,893

    Hi Jimi, nice project! Here's some input from...

    Hi Jimi,

    nice project!
    Here's some input from my side:

    Patchick 1 - the first ever amateur PN discovery (Dana Patchick)
    CTB 1, CTA 1 ... two extraordinarily faint Supernova remnants
    Berkeley...
  4. Replies
    5
    Views
    4,537

    Hi Jimi, Uwe, as already mentioned on amastro...

    Hi Jimi, Uwe,

    as already mentioned on amastro today - yep, it's likely a PN; "only" likely since a confirmatory spectrum is still missing.
    As Uwe wrote already, the object could be held easily...
  5. Hi Reiner et al, here's some of my...

    Hi Reiner et al,

    here's some of my observations of the SNR ring, which has been amongst my summer favourites for several years now. Instrument was an Obsession 15" UC, magnification + filter =...
  6. Hi Uwe, indeed, the two lobes and the CS of Sa...

    Hi Uwe,

    indeed, the two lobes and the CS of Sa 2-237 were visible in my 15" (same location + time as for Uwe's observation, magnification 420x). The view was obviously not as detailed as in Uwe's...
Results 1 to 6 of 6