Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Object of the Week April 17, 2016 - NGC 2685 The Most Unusual Galaxy in the Shapley-Ames Catalog

  1. #1
    Member deepskytraveler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Wheaton, IL USA
    Posts
    106

    Object of the Week April 17, 2016 - NGC 2685 The Most Unusual Galaxy in the Shapley-Ames Catalog

    Object of the Week April 17, 2016 - NGC 2685 The Most Unusual Galaxy in the Shapley-Ames Catalog

    NGC 2685, Arp 336, MCG 10-13-39, PGC 25065, UGC 4666, Helix Galaxy, Pancake Galaxy
    Type: Spiral
    Class: (R)SB0+ pec
    Constellation: Ursa Major
    RA: 08h 55m 34.8
    Dec: +58’ 44”
    Size: 4.1’ x 2.0'
    Magnitude: 12.2


    In 1996 Halton Arp published his extraordinary Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies, a compilation of the most unusual shaped galaxies photographed with the largest telescopes of that period. What made these galaxies peculiar was they did not fit comfortably into the early morphology classifications of Edwin Hubble and Allan Sandage where “the vast majority of galaxies were beautiful and textbook symmetrical.” This wasn’t the case with the Arp galaxies. Labeling these galaxies peculiar was considered by many to be an understatement. Astronomers and astrophysicists gave the Arp galaxies more illuminating descriptions: galactic malformations, galactic bedlam, bizarre, freaks, and train wrecks. Though further peculiar galaxies were increasingly identified and cataloged over the next thirty years, their total population remained small and statistically insignificant (<2%). It wasn’t until 1995 and 1996 when the Hubble Deep Fields North and South brought to light thousands of previously unknown peculiar galaxies was there the understanding there had to be tens of billions of these galaxies dispersed across the sky. Today we know that peculiar galaxies, caused by galactic interactions, are more the rule than the exception.

    Of the 338 peculiar galaxies cataloged by Arp he classified the last six as miscellaneous in the final category of the Atlas, assigning them numbers 333 through 338. In the The Arp Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies, a Chronicle and Observer’s Guide authored by Jeff Kanipe and Dennis Webb these six objects bear the label “unique.” It is not that these six are “more unique” than the other 332 galaxies, but for one reason or another they really stand out. This week’s OOTW is one of these six - Arp 336 – a galaxy first cataloged as NGC 2685.

    n2685 (1).jpg
    DSS Image annotation
    ©Copyright 1996 through 2008
    By Robert E. Erdmann, Jr.



    NGC 2685 was discovered by Wilhelm Tempel with an 11” refractor on August 18, 1882. Located in the constellation Ursa Major it is 50,000 light-years across and located some 42 million light-years away. It is a relatively bright galaxy at magnitude of 12.2. At first glance, particularly at lower powers, it appears to be your average lenticular shaped galaxy, but it is not at all. Bearing a classification of (R)SB0+ pec, NGC 2685 is a confirmed rare polar-ring galaxy.

    A polar-ring galaxy is a type of galaxy in which an outer ring of gas, stars and dust orbits in a plane almost perpendicular to the normal flat plane of the galaxy. These polar rings are thought to form when two galaxies gravitationally interact with each other. One possibility is that material is tidally striped from a passing galaxy, with the captured debris strung out in a rotating ring. The other possibility is that a smaller galaxy collides perpendicular with the plan of rotation of the larger galaxy, with the smaller galaxy effectively forming the polar ring.

    In the case of NGC 2685, several thin filamentary strands, consisting of knots of luminous star-forming regions and hydrogen gas form a helical band perpendicular to the main disk and centered on the galactic nucleus. These structures suggest that NGC 2685 once had a much smaller companion that was captured into a polar orbit and eventually merged with those of the larger system, leaving behind the companion’s interstellar medium. New generations of stars formed from this material to produce the luminous ring seen today. The rotating ring of NGC 2685 is found to be remarkably old and stable.

    arp336.gifbig_arp336.jpeg

    A more complex description of this galaxy is given by Sandage in The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies. “NGC 2685 is perhaps the most unusual galaxy in the Shapley-Ames catalogue. There are two axes of symmetry for the projected image; most galaxies have only one. The central, amorphous spindle resembles a normal S0 seen on edge. However, helical filaments surround the spindle. Because of projection effects, it is impossible to tell whether these filaments form complete circles around the spindle or whether they start somewhere on the spindle and spiral outward at right angles to its axis. The filaments are seen in absorption when they pass in front of the bright background, but they are luminous when they arc not silhouetted. Note how the entire northeast end of the spindle is covered with the projected absorption lanes of the helix. A luminous external ring around the entire structure may be either a true ring or a complete shell seen in projection. Many questions are unanswered about this galaxy. Is the central feature a spheroid (with two axes equal as in a plate or pancake), or is it an ellipsoid like a cigar? What is the direction of the angular momentum vector? Is the external ring attached to the central regions, or is it separate?”

    ngc2685 (3).jpg

    Visual observations of NGC 2685 seem to be as rare as this polar galaxy. Bob Hill from the Amarillo Astronomy Club provides an excellent one. “There is no Arp classification for the last six objects in the atlas, but this one looks as if it would fit into the "interacting double galaxies" class. By the redshift published for this system, 997 kps corrected for the CMB, this is the nearest and brightest polar ring galaxy. That redshift implies that this system is at 2/3 the distance of the Virgo cluster, around 35-40 MLY. I looked at the MAST web site and found Hubble images taken in 1998 and 1999 of 2685, and it is not resolved into stars. This is a case wherein the redshift indicates that the galaxy is much nearer than it actually is. In the 20" at 423x 2685 is a spindle shaped object 2'x.5' aligned NE-SW. It has a bright core region that is .5'x.3' in size. There is a bright field star located 2.5' N of the core. On the side of the galaxy towards that field star there were occasional dark contrast features that would cross the plane of 2685. There is a very faint half oval brightening of the field about 1' in length at right angles to the system on the NW side of the galaxy.”

    Now it is your turn to get out and observe a most peculiar and unusual galaxy – NGC 2685.

    "Give it a go and let us know!”
    Last edited by deepskytraveler; April 20th, 2016 at 04:02 AM.
    Clear Skies,

    Mark Friedman
    Wheaton, IL USA

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    813
    Very nice Mark.

    Several years ago, when scopes 20"+ were not usual in Germany I took the chance to try this guy with a very fine 24". Similar as you I could detect a very faint glow of the polar ring on the NW side. No sign on the SE side.
    I would be interested how the galaxy looks like in 30"+ telescopes? Jimi, Jim...?

    24", 390x, NELM 6m5+
    NGC2685.jpg
    Clear Skies, uwe
    http://www.deepsky-visuell.de
    Germany

    27" f/4,2

  3. #3
    Big Jim Jim Chandler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Fort Davis, Texas
    Posts
    91
    My only log note for 2685 is from 2005 using a 25", and is rather rudimentary. (Back then I scribbled notes on paper and transcribed them into Sky Tools later, sometimes days later. This tended to limit the amount of detail in the logs.) Although there is no way to be sure now, I presume this note alludes to the NW bulge:

    "Almost edge-on spiral, birght core, halo extends farther in one direction. With averted vision, the halo gets fatter, but not much longer."
    Last edited by Jim Chandler; April 21st, 2016 at 01:15 PM.
    Jim

    Obsession 30" f/4.5

  4. #4
    Member Howard B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Scappoose, Oregon USA
    Posts
    571
    I have an observation of 2685 with Jimi's 48 inch from April 2013:

    "The target here is 2685's polar ring, which I can just barely detect as a small bit of a very faint arc segment that's detached from the main galaxy. The sky background is slightly darker on the other side of the galaxy. 10mm, 21.57 SQM."

    Arp336-N2685_crop.jpg Arp336-N2685_cropinvert.jpg

    So the view was pretty much the same as what Uwe saw in the 24 inch scope and Jim in his 30 inch. My one observation of 2685 through my 28 inch was under poor conditions and I didn't see any trace of the polar ring.
    Howard
    30-inch f/2.7 alt-az Newtonian
    https://sites.google.com/site/howardbanichhomepage/
    https://sites.google.com/site/sprays...pemirrors/home
    Contributing Editor, Sky & Telescope magazine

  5. #5
    Member Don Pensack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    194
    Alas, in my tiny 12.5", all I noted was a moderately bright cigar-shape with some indistinct haze around it.
    I noted no noticeable stellar-sized nucleus, either.
    Don Pensack
    www.EyepiecesEtc.com
    Los Angeles

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    La Serena, Chile
    Posts
    427
    I observed this galaxy last night with my 20" under SQM 21.1 skies. My notes read:

    At 427x visible as an elongated galaxy with a brighter central region and a stellar nucleus. On one side of the galaxy just off the major axis lies a bright star. Next to the stellar nucleus, toward that bright star, I see a foreground star which is barely brighter than the rest of the galaxy there. On the other side the major axis seems to end in a faint hook, though it may be a faint star lying there. On that same side I think I may occasionally see a faint glow light up off the major axis between the stellar nucleus and the hook, but this is a very doubtful observation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •