Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Object of the Week July 31st, 2016 - NGC 6445, the Box Nebula

  1. #1
    Member Steve Gottlieb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    804

    Object of the Week July 31st, 2016 - NGC 6445, the Box Nebula

    NGC 6445
    Aliases: PK 8+3.1 = ESO 589-PN9 = PN G008.0+03.9 = Box Nebula
    RA: 17h 49m 15.3s
    DEC: -20° 00' 34"
    Class: 3b(3)
    Size: 38" x 29"
    Mag: V ~ 10.9

    William Herschel discovered NGC 6445 on 28 May 1786 (his 569th sweep) and recorded "pretty bright, small, irregular figure." Due to it irregular shape, he placed in his class II ("faint nebulae") instead of his class IV ("planetary nebulae")

    Lord Rosse (or observing assistant William Rambaut) examined it with the massive 72-inch speculum reflector on 11 Mar 1848. It was described as a "curious circular-shaped neb with large dark spot at one side [f side in a diagram], around which is a close cluster of well defined vS stars." A more detailed visual description was provided in 1887 by American astronomer Frank Muller using the 26-inch Clark refractor at the Leander McCormick Observatory in Virginia. Muller noted "Two nuclei forming an elliptical nebula, elongated 150°, largest diameter 26", northern nucleus brighter. A sketch shows each nucleus to be elongated in the direction 90° +/-, the center being almost devoid of nebulosity. The nuclei are entirely separated from each other except by very faint nebulosity, and are of the 12.5 magnitiude."

    The study the various forms of planetary nebula, Curtis Heber used the 36" Crossley reflector at Lick Observatory to photograph all known planetaries north of -34° declination. His pioneering results were reported in the 1918 Publications of the Lick Observatory, and he noted "...the brighter portion [of NGC 6445] is a very irregular "square-shouldered" ring 38" x 29"; from this extend very faint ring-like ansae in PA 50°-230° [NE to SW]..." This captures the appearance very well.

    NGC 6445.jpg

    By the way, you may find NGC 6445 referred to as the "Little Gem", which could be an appropriate nickname. But that moniker was originally applied by John Mallas to NGC 6818. So, to avoid confusion I'm calling it the "Box Nebula".

    Here are two observations with my 24-inch and 18-inch scopes ---

    24-inch: This highly structured planetary was observed using 500x. NGC 6445 has an unusual rectangular shape, elongated 3:2 NW-SE, with dimensions ~45"x30". The planetary is brighter in fairly narrow strips along the four sides, creating an annular appearance. The short northwest facing side is slightly brighter and contains a bright knot or section near the middle. In addition, a faint knot is at the north vertex. Another bright knot is at the east vertex and either a faint knot or star is at the south vertex. The short southeast facing side is sharply defined and quite straight. A very low surface brightness glow can be seen ouside (east) of the eastern vertex. In addition, with careful viewing an extremely faint outer shell or loop is ouside the long southwest facing side, connected at the two vertices along this side. A mag ~15.5 star is just outside the midpoint of the loop. The outer shell or loop on the northeast side was not seen.

    18-inch: NGC 6445 is a fascinating planetary at 435x. The overall shape is rectangular with the longer sides oriented NW to SE. Both ends are noticeably brighter giving an annular appearance. The NW end is slightly brighter and irregular in surface brightness with a brighter spot or two. The rim at the northwest end is slightly bowed out and has a well-defined boundary edge in the interior. The rim at the southeast end of the planetary is unusually straight and well-defined. With averted vision it appeared to extend slightly beyond the main body of the planetary. The bright lobe at this end is bar-shaped and extended SW to NE in the direction of the minor axis.

    NGC 6445(2).jpg

    GIVE IT A GO AND LET US KNOW!
    Last edited by Steve Gottlieb; August 2nd, 2016 at 04:22 PM.
    Steve
    24" f/3.7 Starstructure
    18" f/4.3 Starmaster
    Adventures in Deep Space
    Contributing Editor, Sky & Tel

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Bohemia, EU
    Posts
    18
    This planetary is also well known as the Crescent nebula (other than NGC 6888 in Cygnus). By the way the original Box nebula is NGC 6309 in Ophiuchus so I think we need another name for NGC 6445...
    Vic

  3. #3
    Member Steve Gottlieb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    804
    Haven't heard it called the Crescent Nebula (only NGC 6888). How about we just call NGC 6445 -- NGC 6445 and let's forget the nickname confusion!
    Last edited by Steve Gottlieb; August 2nd, 2016 at 06:14 PM.
    Steve
    24" f/3.7 Starstructure
    18" f/4.3 Starmaster
    Adventures in Deep Space
    Contributing Editor, Sky & Tel

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    813
    Hi Steve,

    fascinating PN.
    I studied your descriptions with 18" and 24" and had pretty the same results with 16" several years ago. Rectangular shape, knots and the very faint extensions to the SW. Like you I missed the fainter lobes at the NE.

    16", 450x, UHC, Seeing II, NELM 7m+
    NGC6445.jpg
    Clear Skies, uwe
    http://www.deepsky-visuell.de
    Germany

    27" f/4,2

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    La Serena, Chile
    Posts
    427
    Here are my notes from last Friday under an SQM 20.9 sky using my 20" telescope:

    At 256x and OIII visible as a rectangluar nebula. The north west and south east sides are brighter than the north east and south west sides. Both bright sides have one or more brighter knots, especially the north western side. Further north west lies a faint star. A long, faint, extension is visible to the north east and a short, even fainter, extension to the south west.

  6. #6
    Member Steve Gottlieb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    804
    Thanks for posting your observing, Wouter. Interestingly, I viewed the southwest facing loop (here's another image) but didn't see the northeast extension. In any case, I hope others take a look (and report results), as this planetary has an unusual structure!
    Last edited by Steve Gottlieb; August 9th, 2016 at 02:13 PM.
    Steve
    24" f/3.7 Starstructure
    18" f/4.3 Starmaster
    Adventures in Deep Space
    Contributing Editor, Sky & Tel

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    La Serena, Chile
    Posts
    427
    Thanks for your comments, Steve. I'll try to catch the southwest loop from darker skies!

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    184
    Did manage to catch this with a Tak Mewlon 210 from the UK using a NPB filter. It was surprsingly easy despite its very low elevation and showed a squarish shape. Will neeed to see if I can get it with one of the bigger scopes before Sgr disappears again.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •